New York Attorney General Letitia James, who campaigned on a promise to hold former President Donald Trump accountable for financial misconduct, now faces her own allegations of mortgage fraud. Referred to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), these accusations highlight a striking irony: James, who pursued Trump for inflating property values to secure favorable loans, is accused of similar deceptive practices in her real estate dealings. Below is a detailed overview of the case, the charges, and the broader implications as of May 13, 2025.
Background
Elected in 2019 as New York’s first African American and first female Attorney General, Letitia James built her campaign on a pledge to combat corruption, specifically targeting Donald Trump. During her 2018 run, she vowed to investigate Trump’s business dealings, famously stating she would “join with law enforcement and other attorneys general across this nation in removing this president from office.” Her civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and the Trump Organization culminated in a $454 million judgment in 2024, accusing him of misrepresenting property values to obtain better loan and insurance terms. However, in April 2025, James found herself under scrutiny for allegedly engaging in comparable fraudulent practices, casting a shadow over her tenure and exposing a profound irony.
Allegations of Mortgage Fraud
The FHFA, under Director William Pulte, referred James for criminal prosecution, alleging she falsified records to secure favorable loan terms for properties in Virginia and New York. The referral, sent to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, outlines three key accusations:
- False Declaration of Primary Residence in Virginia
In August 2023, James purchased a 1,450-square-foot home in Norfolk, Virginia, for $240,000 with a $219,780 mortgage. A power-of-attorney document, signed by James and authorizing her niece, Shamice Thompson-Hairston, to complete the purchase, declared the property as James’s “principal residence.” This claim is critical, as primary residences qualify for lower mortgage rates than secondary or investment properties. Yet, as New York’s Attorney General, James is required to reside in New York, raising doubts about the truthfulness of her declaration. Critics argue this misrepresentation may have secured her a better interest rate, potentially constituting mortgage fraud. - Misrepresentation of Brooklyn Property Units
In 2001, James acquired a multi-family property in Brooklyn, classified by a New York City Department of Buildings certificate of occupancy as a five-unit dwelling. However, in mortgage applications and building permits from 2021, James allegedly represented the property as having only four units. Properties with four or fewer units are eligible for more favorable mortgage terms, which could have saved James significant costs. Financial expert Sam Antar, who brought these allegations to light, noted that James never filed an Alt-1 application to amend the unit count despite owning the property for over two decades. This discrepancy suggests intentional misrepresentation to gain financial benefits. - Misrepresentation of Relationship in Earlier Transactions
The referral also cites documents from 1983 and 2000 related to a Queens property James purchased with her father. In these transactions, James and her father were allegedly listed as “husband and wife” on mortgage documents, possibly to meet lending criteria reserved for married couples. While these claims may be too old to prosecute due to statutes of limitations, they contribute to a pattern of questionable financial dealings.
The Irony of James’s Campaign Promises
The allegations against James are particularly ironic given her campaign rhetoric and legal pursuits. Running for Attorney General, James positioned herself as a champion of integrity, vowing to root out fraud and hold powerful figures like Trump accountable. Her 2018 campaign ads and speeches emphasized her intent to jail Trump for financial misdeeds, particularly his alleged manipulation of property valuations to secure loans. Her office’s 2024 victory against Trump, securing a $454 million penalty for similar fraud, was touted as a triumph of justice. Yet, the accusations that James misrepresented her Virginia property’s residency status and her Brooklyn property’s unit count mirror the very practices she condemned in Trump. This parallel has fueled criticism that James’s pursuit of Trump was hypocritical, as she allegedly engaged in the same type of financial deception she sought to punish. Former assistant U.S. Attorney Gene Rossi remarked, “The irony is rich—James built her career on exposing fraud, only to face allegations of doing the same thing she accused Trump of.”
Letitia James is absolutely right. "No matter how powerful you think you are, no one is above the law". Funny how that hits differently when it's her name on the docket. 😂 pic.twitter.com/khW7s4V1NF
— ElizaTino (@elizatino) May 11, 2025
Criminal Investigation
In May 2025, the DOJ, with the FBI leading the effort, launched a formal criminal investigation into James’s real estate transactions. A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia has issued subpoenas, focusing on the Norfolk property’s mortgage application. Potential charges include wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and making false statements to a financial institution, each carrying severe penalties—up to 30 years in prison and fines of $1 million for wire and bank fraud if a financial institution was affected.
The investigation’s timing and political context have intensified scrutiny. James’s office has accused the Trump administration of orchestrating a “retaliatory” probe, pointing to Trump’s public calls for her prosecution and his administration’s actions against other critics, such as revoking security clearances. The involvement of Trump-appointed officials like Bondi and Blanche has further fueled claims of political bias.
Letitia James should be prosecuted and thrown in prison for 20+ years pic.twitter.com/3UUesxr8OB
— Don_Vito 🇺🇸 (@Don_Vito_08) May 4, 2025
James’s Defense
James and her legal team, led by attorney Abbe Lowell, have dismissed the allegations as “baseless” and politically motivated. In an NY1 interview, James stated, “These accusations are retaliation for my successful actions against Donald Trump. I will not be distracted from protecting New Yorkers.” Lowell argues that any errors in the Virginia property’s power-of-attorney document were unintentional, claiming James informed the mortgage broker that the home would not be her primary residence. On the Brooklyn property, James’s office maintains it has always been an owner-occupied, four-unit residence, though it has not clarified whether the Department of Buildings was notified to update the certificate of occupancy. Lowell has framed the investigation as an attempt to discredit James, aligning with Trump’s broader pattern of targeting adversaries.
Political and Legal Implications
Legal experts are divided on the case’s merits. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani and New York trial attorney Nicole Brenecki suggest that, if substantiated, the allegations could support civil or criminal fraud charges, as falsifying documents for financial gain is a serious offense. However, Brenecki noted that statutes of limitations may bar prosecution of older claims, and the political fallout may overshadow legal consequences. The allegations have already damaged James’s public image, with critics using her own rhetoric against Trump to question her credibility.
New York real estate attorney Pierre Debbas argues that while the Virginia case technically involves mortgage fraud, it may not warrant criminal charges and appears retaliatory. Conversely, the America First Legal Foundation, a pro-Trump group, has filed an ethics complaint against James, and Rensselaer County Executive Steve McLaughlin has called for attorney grievance committees to investigate her conduct, amplifying the case’s political dimensions.
Current Status
As of May 13, 2025, James has not been formally charged, and the DOJ’s investigation continues. The Virginia grand jury is still reviewing evidence, and it remains uncertain whether the allegations will lead to an indictment. James, represented by Lowell, has launched a robust defense and a high-dollar fundraiser for her 2026 re-election campaign, signaling her determination to weather the storm. Her office remains active, pursuing lawsuits against Trump’s administration policies, including immigration and healthcare measures.
JUSTICE IS COMING!
— 🇺🇲Salty Texan (@texan_maga) May 13, 2025
🚨 Letitia James is facing 30 years in federal prison and a 1 million dollar fine. She lied on loan applications to get better interest rates, she even listed her father as her husband on one of them.
.@TishJames pic.twitter.com/m0INAhTGOR
Final Thoughts
The fraud allegations against Letitia James underscore a bitter irony: a prosecutor who campaigned on jailing Donald Trump for financial fraud now faces accusations of similar misconduct. Whether the claims hold up in court or prove to be politically motivated, they have already reshaped the narrative around James’s tenure. The ongoing DOJ investigation will determine whether these allegations result in legal consequences or serve as a flashpoint in a broader political battle. For now, James stands firm, defending her record and vowing to continue her work. The resolution of this case will test the integrity of the judicial process and shape public trust in New York’s top law enforcement official.
Add Comment